Task 5
Materials and tools for a working group:
parachutes made from different materials from the previous task
Pupils solve a research question: Which material is best suited to create a parachute (which slows down most)? The aim is for pupils to find out by their own research (with the help of a teacher) which material is most suitable for the production of the parachute. First, the teacher guides the pupils to try and create the predictions about which materials they use to work best. Pupils have available materials to view. They should try to describe what features a material should be used to make the best parachute. Thinking about materials is important, the teacher has a chance to see if the pupil registers the link between the quality of the material and how the parachute works.
To facilitate the exploration of the pupils, the combinatorial task to be addressed in the examination of the four materials to the pupils we provide or present them an example of what to do if we want from four possible materials to find out which is better. The semifinals and the finals of various competitions work on a similar principle. The pupils first compare Sample 1 with sample 2 and in particular sample 3 with sample 4. This way we exclude materials that are less suitable for parachute formation and will remain with two „winning“ materials that just compare. When creating parachutes, we ensure that pupils construct parachutes in the same way that they use equally large pieces of different materials examined, as well as long laces, the same method of attachment to materials and equally large pieces of plasters instead of weights. When comparing two parachutes, we ensure that both of the matched parachutes always run from the same height. For these details, please note that this is part of the development capability to conduct an experiment that we can use to verify our own predictions. The results will be recorded in Task 5.
In conclusion, the teacher can lead pupils to interpretation. Pupils compare materials and try to find out which material property caused the parachute to work better. The discussion can lead , for example, to the fact that the holes in the material reduce the functionality of the parachute, while the pupils still have the willingness to explore, we can provide them with various other materials (always the same large pieces, because the size of the parachute also influences its functionality) and let them Investigate their predictions spontaneously. Very suitable materials are microcups (different thicknesses), Celloethane, but also silk. If the subsequent investigation was carried out, it would be appropriate to create a conclusion and evaluate which material is most appropriate and whether it was confirmed by what they thought about the characteristics that affect the functioning of the parachute.
Other research issues that can be dealt within the object matter is how the size of the material we use to create the parachute affects the functionality of the parachute. To develop precise working with variables, pupils are important to note that if we compare the size of the parachute, we must produce parachutes from the same material because in the previous investigation we found that the quality of the material also influences the functionality of the Parachute. Parachutes should be made in a consistent manner, the only difference between the two fallen blocks will be the size of the substance used for its production.